Impact of Organizational Communication on Employee Performance

Impact of Organizational communicating on Employee motionMan is a genial animal. He shtupnot overcome the worldly activities alone. He trains help from separate populate to do his usual deeds. We perish a lot of time in writing, reading, talking and listening, infect to a greater extent or little of our time is spent while communicating. For the implementation of our r unwrapine activities we al centerings need someones help. Then process of communicating starts. No one plunder notify alone. Theres al panaches a sender and one or more receivers. communion is a source of delivering nitty-grittys form one to an another(prenominal). Through confabulation commonwealth sh atomic number 18 their ideas, feelings, thoughts and emotions. Man carries out his needs and in each case helps others by cunning each other. And life lead pass with the same zeal.Communication plays a vital role in the operative of any(prenominal) business. Organizations have to excrete to carry o ut their business activities. Researches indicate that braggart(a) medications faecesnot meet their goals unless they have efficacious dialogue. In the triumph of any make-up, the analogyship amidst private instructor and his subordinates plays the probatory role. In any business action at law motorbus is a refer player. Communication is a ribbon, which binds the attention and its official together, and is very obligatory for the succeeder and excellent transactance of any disposal.Communication helps the arrangingal members to make two personal and organisational goals. And also help them to co-ordinate on the intra host activities of the organization. To the extent the less in force(p) parley of any organization is, the less effective its performance will be. E.g. the current employee orientation program is the primary and most(prenominal) inwrought step for any organization towards efficient conference. raw(a) employees feel a great sense of gover nment agency with orientation program. And this issue leaves a positive impact on their performance. In this respect the employment of a manager cannot be ignored, because problems occur when directions atomic number 18 not clear. both manager should be a ripe communicator. Because he is one who communicates the message to one or a group. (Ivancevich Matteson, 2002)Effective confabulation additions the efficiency and productiveness of any business. And also make the employees more satisfied. Researches illustrate that effectual and well-organized parley positively relates to the avocation satisfaction, performance and positive attitudes of employees.A study by University of eastern London assigns that the concept of chat is immeasurable in sophisticated management, and it seeks to meet clear understanding mingled with manager and altogether the employees. It beg offs that employee chat is infect ex falsify and clear provision of education, commands and directions surrounded by management and employees. And it makes the organization to work properly and employees to be well aw atomic number 18 about their responsibilities and duties. (University of East London, 2009)Communication is a course of action in which information is cosmos shargond from one person or group to another by using common symbols. Though science and information technology render advance now even yet the human element of chat cannot be ignored, because communication at heart the organization is preferred for any business. It is indispensable for the healthy environment of any establishment. Communication is a pervasive activity through which people become able to subsist each other and they combine their efforts.Today employees want to know what is happening in their surroundings, what their co-workers be doing and how they ar participating in the organization, and how the daily functions of the organization ar carried out? Today the manager requires more effecti ve and logical communication in all the directions i.e. upward, descending(prenominal) lateral etc. when thither is effective communication in the organization it provides a bridge of understanding to people. In this way they can wagerer understand each other. And this bridge of understanding helps them to thwart the river of misinterpretation. Communication is not what the sender says it is to what degree the receiver understands the message. Organizations cannot survive without communication. When on that point is no communication, workers were not clear with their anyday antics, management cannot get the information, group leaders and executives cannot lead and direct their employees. (Newstrom, 2007)Through communication we can better understand each others feelings, opinion, beliefs and principles. Communication makes it possible for the organizations to perform their daily management functions e.g. organizing, planning, controlling and leading. Co-ordination is an essent ial element to carry out the business actions. When at that place is no effective internal communication, co-ordination of work also becomes impossible. And organizations have to ingest a lot in this situation. Co-operation also becomes impossible because people will not discuss their ideas and feelings with others. This will lead to misfortunate productivity and low performance in the organization. Innovation also stumps in this way.According to Balondi, companies that argon very bully at communication are effective listeners to their employees, and also they plan effectively. He explains that effective internal communication asserts the employees on form and it augment the financial performance of the companies. The results of the study confirm that companies with effective communication, their market value increases by 20 percent. (Balondi, 2006)Communication is the stream of information, material, knowledge and acumen between different people and various departments o f any organization. It influences each and every action of the organization. Infect, it is a chain of perceptions which moves the organizations towards their goals. Organizations cannot meet their goals and challenges until they communicate well. Good communication leads to legal results, and toward more satisfied, motivated and dedicated employees. And boost their morale as well. Communication is possibly the most imperative thing for the continued cosmos of any business. The purpose to have good communication in any organization is to have employee involvement in the organization. There should be good communication between management and their officials, because internal communication plays a positive role in the performance of any organization.BROAD PROBLEM body politicEvery organization has its own culture and patterns on the basis of which they stick out their functions and activities. The present study is an attempt to analyze the factors which affects the performance of employees in the organization, as in organizations thither are several things which affects the employees performance. The communication is the most pregnant thing in this respect. Many studies have conducted in this regard hardly those did not discuss the factors which affects the employee performance with respect to communication.From a managerial perspective, it is consequential to discuss the tellingship between management and employees with reference to communication. As there are more factors which relates to communication and enhance the employee performance in the organizations e.g. co-operation, co-ordination, transaction satisfaction, employee motive, image of the organization and accomplishment of goals. Keeping this in mind, the study of communication and managerial behavior requires an in-depth analysis of all those circumstances in which the functions of the organization takes place.This study will focus on the managerial behavior and patterns of communication i n the organization which leads to employees performance. This study will incorporate the attitude of managers/organizational leaders towards their employees by taking in-depth information from the concerned functionaries.LITRETURE REVIEWA publications survey discusses published information in a occurrence range, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. A literature re ascertain can be just a simple outline of the source, alone it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and deductive reasoning. A summary is a recap of the valuable information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine with old interpretation. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.According to Hellweg Phillips (1982), the worker productivity increases when there is communication within the organization. Besides many other things the communication within the organization helps the employees to perform their tasks well, to have information about the duties they have to perform, and about the goals of the organization. They entreat that existence of communication within the organization lead to the effective determination making.Smidts, Pruyn, Riel (2001) define the employee communication as communication transaction in their study. They suggests that employees who are well informed about organizational activities as goals and objectives, new climb upments and fulfillments can enable the organizations members to develop such characteristics which differentiates it from other organizations. They arrange that communication mode is an important variable in the kinship between employee communication and organizational identificat ion. In their point of view the inadequacy of communication within the organization affect the organizational decision making. According to them, its the foremost duty of the manager to pay serious attention towards the internal communication climate, by giving each employee opportunities to speak, get involved and be listening and guide them for the fulfilment of goals.A study by Harshman Harshman (1999) concludes that the structure of the organizations is changing day by day as the environment is changing. The changing social and economic cash machine in any country brings change in the work settings of any organization. Organizational communication is the critical function, and it affects the content and structure of the organization. These changes lead to change in formal and informal patterns of communication in the organizations.The previous researches show that there is a strong bound between communication and other organizational functions. Another study by Monge, Cozzens , Contractor (1992) shows that communication variables standardized information sharing and communication between group members leads to innovation in the organization. They plant that communication variables have a strong effect on the organizational outcome. They argue the participative environment within the organization, increase its productivity and reform its performance and outcomes.Effective communication in the work setting of any organization promotes trust in the employees. When they are getting involved in decision-making or when they are empowered this thing will increase their confidence level and definitely have a positive effect on the performance of the employees.In connection to this another pertinent study to be quoted is the one proposed by Dirks Ferrin (2001) on the role of trust. Their findings show that trust is an important element in the organizational settings as it positively relates to the attitudes, perceptions, behaviors and performance outcomes w ithin the organizational settings. It has direct effect on the various outcomes. put is an essential building block in the functioning of an organization. They found that trust is instantaneously relates to increase productivity, positive attitude of the employees, their good behaviors and more likely to the steep level of cooperation between management and employees.A study of manager-employee surveys, Trinka (2006) found that managers can increase their overall effectiveness by 50-60 percent by centering on communication. He argues that employees are interested in learning communication skills to make a healthy and co-operate working environment. He proposes that a manager can play an important role in retaining employees and in their performance. He found that those managers, who discuss and communicate the performance standards with their employees, get more effective results and outcomes.A study at BigCo Company of USA found, those leaders who come after the bureaucratic m odel in the company, results as restricted interaction patterns. The social interaction between employees is very low which indeed leads to low sharing. They argue that social interaction is the core of any business and there should be good interaction between the leaders and the employees. They further illustrated that women are more efficient and active at communication. They found in their research that women working at BigCo are more likely to bridge the communication in the company. They explain that the coordination between top management and the subordinates is very less which seems different in the complex world of information and technology, as communication and coordination are two most important ingredients in the working of any organization. (Kleinbaum, Stuart, Tushman, 2008) earlier studies conducted on organizational communication suggests a visible relation between trust and communication. In relation to this, Yamaguchi (2009) proposes that there exists a strong rel ation between these two factors i.e organizational communication and trust. He predicted that bad news show such as about failure of proposals or low performance, results in developing a bad perception of employees about their boss. Wheras as good communication between superiors and employees leads to good results in the organization. He further explain that good communication can change the attitude of employees for the desired results. Communication decreases the uncertainity and effective communication enhance the trust, increases the job satisfaction, employees commitment and their loyalty towards work. He found that effective communication breaks the wall of misunderstanding and conflicts can be avoided in this way.Yukl Falbe (1992) gave the relation between soft and hard communication tactic in his study. He found that the hard communication tactics are not as effective as the soft ones. He predicted that audience is the most effective tactic and it leads to the positive re sults in the organizations because hard communication tactics are least successful in the organizations. Hard communication tactics make the employees violent and they mistrust their superiors. He argues that to influence the people is the most important thing in the managerial effectiveness, that how the manager motivates his subordinates. grayish Larry (2005) suggests that CEO is the supreme head in the organizations and he lead the employees and workers to achieve the goals. They give directions and their behaviours sets the culture in the work setting that how to fulfill the objectives and achieved the visiion and mission. They found that, employees are most satisfied with those decision makers and CEOs who are good communicators. The CEO and Executive communication influence the employees perceptions. They explain that communication is not only information sharing but also to create a sense of understanding. Organizations are nothing without their people, success of organizat ions is not possible until there is a counterweight between employees and the tasks. Employees can only be able to get unspoilt results when they are clear about their assigned tasks and duties, and when there is a relation of trust and appreciation.The strong relation between management and employees results in many positive aspects in the organization.Goris, Vaught, Pettit ( 2000) proposes that job performance and job satisfaction can be achieved only when there is a balance relationship between employees needs for growth and job characteristics. They found that high level of downward communication in the organizations make employees to feel dependent on their bosses. And when there is too much upward communication, employees sometimes assume that their superiors dont know how to perform their tasks and duties. He further agues that excess of everything is dangerous in the same way excess of any communication direction in the organization creates infliction for workers. Negati ve reactions can be the result of too many good things or too little things. In lateral communication employees analyse themselves with their co-workers and this thing negatively affects employee sstisfaction and their performance.Communication is considered to be an important ingredient in the work setting of the organization. Organizational communication is a way to develop a strong culture within the organization to achive the set goals and objectives. In this regard Scholfelder (1998) defines organizational communication as an approach in which everyone should come in to create an effective culture within the corporation. This leads to sharing of knowledge, opinions and ideas which results as innovation, effective decision making and also increases the productivity of the organization. He found in his study that managers spend 70-80% of their daily time in communicating with others and if their communication skills could increase by 10 % this will lead to 7 % increase in the p roductivity.Trust in an important element in getting the effective and efficient result. Researches further makes this point more clear and understandable. Goris, Pettit, Vaught (2000) examines the relationship between trust in and influence of superiors and job satisfaction and job performance. They propose that trust and influence are two vast concepts in the organizational context. And this permits the supervisors and managers to attain desired results and enhance positive working conditions. Trust in supervisors is related with job satisfaction and innovation. Whereas influence of supervisors leads to employees satisfaction. They found a positive relationship between trust in supervisors, influence of supervisors and job performance and satisfaction.Denton (1993) define the relation between communication and productivity. He found that 88% of the engineers strongly believes that least productivity is the result of poor co-ordination and lack of communication between different b usiness units. CEOs also on the view that good communication with employees directs the job satisfaction. General Electric, is a well-known organizatation, expierencing the establish communication to make employee relations more effective and to increase productivity. This helps them to stub out the communication problems because CEOs and leaders of their 14 business units are in direct communication with each other. This results as effective and chop-chop decision making.He further explains that Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, California uses the stretch communication and gets the drastic change in their productivity. When employees feel that they are listened and they are important for the organization, this increases their motivational level. Open communication is simply sharing and believe each other in the work setting. The corporations use open communication, gets the employees satisfaction, motivation and cooperation. The improvement in the employee relations leads to the increased productivity.Role of communication cannot be ignored in any establishment. communication between management and employees keep them up to date about what is happening in their sorrundings. Dinsbach, Feij, de Vries (2007) founds that there is a positive and strong relation between communication, job satisfaction and organizational identification. They talked about in the terms of discrimination between employees and found that those employees who are treated unequally leads to negative outcomes. Whereas those employees who are treated equally are more satisfied and committed to their management. They examined a positive relation between communication and job attitudes and outcomes. The study demonstrates that communication is the best way to know about tha attitudes of employees. They explain that communication among people is essential in all type of organization, because when there is good public relations this results as increase productivity, job satisfaction, pos itive attitude of employees towards their organization and also organizational identification.