Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet – Film Comparison

There ar many differences mingled with the commandors techniques used in both withdraws. The choice of location is evidently different. Baz Luhrmann in his 1997 magnetic declination of the pack presents Verona as a current city, dominated by panoramas of chaotic urban violence. He uses panning shots across the metropolis with police cars and helicopters darting about, and homo casualties strewn across the ground. This would be quite different to Shakespe ars original setting in a rural Italian town. Verona beach is the cities name, and this is used thorough sorry fallacy to create a no-accounter feel to the film Mercutios death crab A plague, on both your houses seem to necessitate immediate egress as a storm is called in.In Zeffirellis 1968 film, Verona is a closer imitation to what Shakespeargon might have had in mind in the late 1500s a small town, with only a few icons such as the perform and the market place, instead of a whole city as in Luhrmanns film.Baz L uhrmann uses wide, panning aired shots of the city, with quick changes for ideal the introductory scene when flashes of newspaper headlines are converse with writing from the chorus of the play. These camera shots create a sense of indispensability and imp end uping doom. He uses stills on the characters pillowcases to emphasize emotions, and in like manner on let out features to highlight their importance to the audience. For example the statue of Christ with his arms outstretched, the heads of both families & record footage of the previous brawls.The camera shots in Franco Zeffirellis film differ though his much extensive use of close up action shots such as the marketplace brawl between the Montagues and the Capulets. The diegetic gruellings add realism, and so the audience feels similar a participant in the action, rather than an onlooker. Zeffirelli also places the camera in the centre of the two families, to create a sense of equality and residuum emphasising t he Both alike in dignity, quote from the chorus.The two directors have interpret the mood differently, and this is shown in numerous guidances clothing, accent and attitude are all contri provideding factors. In Luhrmans film the Montagues are all shown with Hawaiian shirts and army haircuts, but they turn out to be the weaker, to a greater extent pliable family when faced with the prospect of fighting without their masters.The Capulets however are completely different. With dark leather jackets and sunglasses they radiate malice, this is also shown though the music, as natural noises are heightened and western type music slowly plays. The sunglasses could also be a disguise, hiding their eyes and their background roots as Latin people. Latinos were considered to be an inferior race in America, and so they are trying to hide this by acting more aggressive and red-faced towards anyone who could be a threat.Zeffirelli uses bright and colourful costumes in his film for the Capule ts they are more laid back, almost like practical jokers with nothing to do. The cash dispenser that they create lacks any agreeable of malice. It is almost the same with the Montagues in this film, but they wear more neutral colours, such as dark blue, and obtuse to suggest their scholarly upbringing.There is also the underlying subject of the batch that is controlling Romeo and Juliet For example well(p) after Romeo kills Tybalt he shouts, I am fortunes fool As a character I think Romeo is just trying to blame his own misfortune on virtuallything else to be large-minded of guilt.Dramatic irony also plays a key part in both films, whereby the audience know vital pieces of information that the characters do not. For example in Luhrmanns film when Mercutio is stabbed, he puts on a brave face to his friends but reveals his true pain only to the camera when he turns around. excessively in Zeffirellis film, when Tybalt stabs Mercutio, only he and the audience can see the orig in on his sword.Part 6I think the audience resolution to each film would have been from an entirely different perspective. In Luhrmanns version both families are shown as if they had played an equal part in the death of Romeo & Juliet because of changes throughout the film for example in the opening move scene, the Montagues survive the fight by biting their thumbs at the Capulets, instead of the other behavior around. This film would be suited for a ultramodern audience, as Luhrmann has omitted some of Shakespeares original language, making it accessible to a wider range of people.In the opening scene of the newer film, I think Luhrmann chose a modern city as the setting for the film, to present a hectic urban world acquainted(predicate) to a 20th centuary audience. The media coverage of the feud makes the plays events seem more true to life(predicate) as they watch violent videos of the chaos on the streets of Verona. The updated and renamed Verona Beach is a clever mechan ism by which peaceful and violent worlds collide.Franco Zeffirellis opening to the film was much slower and spread out with a gentle showtime he introduces the film with the briny chorus and then goes on to the marketplace scene the Capulets are the main cause of the trouble and the audience take an instant dislike to them. I think this is a terrible way to start the film as the audience usually judge the main characters within their first few scenes, and Capulets are always the troublemakers.I personally prefer Baz Luhrmanns modern version of the opening scene, as it is more direct and engaging towards a modern audience with better special cause such as the gasoline station explosion it has enhanced sound effects and a wide choice of music. It appeals to me more that the Zeffirelli version, which even though is more accurate and faithful to the original script, it now comes across to me as outdated.Luhrmanns omissions from the original script are vital into understanding what kind of film he wanted to demonstrate for example he cut a lengthy dialogue between the Capulets Sampson and Gregory in favour of a more explosive and dramatic opening to the 3rd brawl in the petrol station.Many of the omissions are also to do with sexual hints or jokes, which would be perfectly ordinary in Shakespearean times, but a modern audience, would not understand or approve of them. Luhrmann also changed the timing of Juliets scene to after Mercutios death to show the change in attitude that Romeo has foregone through, from being more faithful to his wife than his friends to the exact opposite.In the end I think each films outcome was decided by what kind of film the directors wanted to portray to the audience With Baz Luhrmann going for a modern love story / action film, and Franco Zeffirelli opting for a more traditional retelling of the upright play. This influenced how the characters would be portrayed, the location of the films, the scenery and most importantly, th e language in their retelling of Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet.